In the recent personal injury compensation case of Osei-Antwi v. South East London & Kent Bus Co Ltd decided by the Court of Appeal in January 2010, the Court reversed an earlier decision by a judge who decided that a pedestrian was guilty of contributory negligence by standing lawfully on a pavement when she was hit by a bus which had unlawfully mounted the same pavement.

The rear of a bus, while turning a corner, mounted the pavement and hit the female pedestrian.  The judge in the lower Court found that notwithstanding the woman was standing on a designated pavement area she was very close to the road and had not kept a proper look out for the bus.

In February 2010 in the personal injury case of Richardson v Butcher the Court held that the defendant driver had been negligent in hitting an 8 year old child running out from the pavement into the road causing injury, even though in her defence it was found reasonable that she had been concentrating on the vehicle immediately in front of her which was making a turn.

The judge, Burnett J, held that the injured 8 year old child had been in the road for at least 2 seconds and was therefore “there to be seen”. The defendant not seeing the child amounted to a failure to keep a proper look out and she was therefore negligent as her diving had fallen below the standard of care required of a road user.

Published in Truckstop News June 2010.

In this month’s issue Steven Hinchliffe of the specialist Personal Injury Compensation firm Hinchliffes Solicitors will consider more “READERS’ SUCCESSFUL TRIPPING ACCIDENT CLAIMS“

Continuing his review of successfully completed accident injury claims, Steven Hinchliffe looks at more situations experienced by readers of Truckstop News that resulted in an award of personal injury compensation.

All of the accident victims mentioned in these articles are actual clients of my firm, Hinchliffes Solicitors.  They have kindly given their permission for the disclosure of their details, and in particular of their real life experiences of incidents resulting in personal injury claims, and the steps taken to make a successful accident compensation claim.  All of these clients contacted my firm after seeing our details in Truckstop News - and readers may recognise some of the names referred to.

In this article I highlight 2 cases where drivers were injured because of dangerous premises.  As with previous articles, the common trend remains the effect on each individual’s life.  Both men had similar accidents, but sustained quite different degrees of injury and financial loss.  Although using the process of law to make personal injury claims as a means of redress cannot truly compensate for the trauma and inconvenience suffered, it can assist in requiring the guilty party to provide medical treatment and rehabilitation, in addition to financial relief by way of awards of compensation.  As previously indicated, the basic aim of an accident claim is to try and return the injured party to the position that he or she would otherwise have been in had the accident not happened.

In February 2010, in the personal injury compensation claim case of Stanton v Collinson, the Court of Appeal upheld the initial trial judge’s decision that a 16 year old male front seat car passenger who had suffered serious brain damage in a road accident had not been contributory negligent, even though he had carried another passenger on his knees and neither had been wearing seat belts.  The Court of Appeal found that the trial judge was in the best situation to consider the evidence and decide whether the wearing of a seat belt would have reduced the injuries sufficiently to justify a reduction in compensation for contributory negligence.

Published in Truckstop News May 2010.

In this month’s issue Steven Hinchliffe of the specialist Personal Injury Compensation firm Hinchliffes Solicitors will consider “THE IMPACT OF THE NEW PROCESS FOR DEALING WITH ROAD ACCIDENT CLAIMS”

From 30 April 2010 there will be an entirely new process for dealing with road accident claims involving a personal injury.  This has been forced through by the Government, acting under pressure from insurance companies, and it will affect all cases where the overall value of the claim is less than £10,000.  In practice, this will include the overwhelming majority of road accident compensation claims.  However, what are the implications for you - can you be sure that your case will be properly conducted by your solicitor and that you will receive the full amount of compensation you are entitled to?

Published in Truckstop News April 2010. 

In this month’s issue Steven Hinchliffe of the specialist Personal Injury Compensation firm Hinchliffes Solicitors (see their advert on the front page) will consider more “PROFESSIONAL DRIVERS’ SUCCESSFUL ACCIDENT AT WORK CLAIMS”.

Continuing his review of successfully completed accident injury claims, Steven Hinchliffe looks at various situations experienced by readers of Truckstop News that ultimately lead to an award of personal injury compensation.

All of the accident victims mentioned in this series of articles are clients of my firm, Hinchliffes Solicitors.  They have kindly given their permission for the disclosure of their details, and in particular of their real life experiences of incidents resulting in personal injury claims, and the steps taken to make a successful accident compensation claim.  All of these clients contacted my firm after seeing our details in Truckstop News - and some of the names referred to may be familiar to you.

In this article I highlight 2 very different accidents in the working environment and examine the outcome for each individual.  As with the previous articles in this series, the common trend remains the significant effect on each person’s life.  Both of my clients sustained significant injuries and suffered financial losses as a result, including lost earnings.  Although using the established legal processes for making personal injury claims as a means of redress cannot truly compensate for the trauma and inconvenience suffered, in appropriate cases it can assist in requiring the guilty party to provide medical treatment and rehabilitation, in addition to financial relief by way of awards of compensation.  As previously stressed, the fundamental aim of all accident claims is to try and return the injured party to the position that he or she would otherwise have been in had the accident not happened.

Published in Truckstop News March 2010.

In this month’s issue Steven Hinchliffe of the specialist Personal Injury Compensation firm Hinchliffes Solicitors will consider more “READERS’ SUCCESSFUL ACCIDENT CLAIMS”.

Continuing his review of successfully completed accident injury claims, Steven Hinchliffe looks at more situations experienced by readers of Truckstop News that resulted in an award of personal injury compensation.

All of the accident victims mentioned in these articles are actual clients of my firm, Hinchliffes Solicitors.  They have kindly given their permission for the disclosure of their details, and in particular of their real life experiences of incidents resulting in personal injury claims, and the steps taken to make a successful accident compensation claim.  All of these clients contacted my firm after seeing our details in Truckstop News - and readers may recognise some of the names referred to.

In this article I highlight 2 work accident claims involving a fall from a vehicle, but with quite different consequences.  As with the other articles in this series, the common trend remains the effect on each individual’s life.  Both of my clients sustained significant injuries and suffered financial losses as a result, but only one was likely to return to his pre-accident state of fitness.  Although using the process of law to make personal injury claims as a means of redress cannot truly compensate for the trauma and inconvenience suffered, it can assist in requiring the guilty party to provide medical treatment and rehabilitation, in addition to financial relief by way of awards of compensation.  As previously indicated, the basic aim of an accident claim is to try and return the injured party to the position that he or she would otherwise have been in had the accident not happened.

Published in Truckstop News February 2010.

In this month’s second article Steven Hinchliffe of the specialist Personal Injury Compensation firm Hinchliffes Solicitors returns to consider more “READERS’ SUCCESSFUL WORK ACCIDENT CLAIMS”.

Returning to his review of successfully completed accident injury claims, Steven Hinchliffe looks at various situations experienced by readers of Truckstop News that ultimately lead to an award of personal injury compensation.

All of the accident victims mentioned in this series of articles are clients of my firm, Hinchliffes Solicitors.  They have kindly given their permission for the disclosure of their details, and in particular of their real life experiences of incidents resulting in personal injury claims, and the steps taken to make a successful accident compensation claim.  All of these clients contacted my firm after seeing our details in Truckstop News - and some of the names referred to may be familiar to you.

In this article I highlight 2 different types of accident at work claims and examine the outcomes.  As with the previous articles, the common trend that emerges is the significant effect on each individual’s life.  Both of my clients sustained significant injuries and suffered financial losses as a result, including lost income.  Although using the established legal processes for making personal injury claims as a means of redress cannot truly compensate for the trauma and inconvenience suffered, it can assist in requiring the guilty party to provide medical treatment and rehabilitation, in addition to financial relief by way of awards of compensation.  As previously stressed, the fundamental aim of all accident claims is to try and return the injured party to the position that he or she would otherwise have been in had the accident not happened.

Published in Truckstop News January 2010.

In this month’s issue Steven Hinchliffe of the specialist Personal Injury Compensation firm Hinchliffes Solicitors considers “THE PITFALLS OF DEALING DIRECT WITH INSURERS IN A ROAD ACCIDENT CLAIM”

This article looks at the very beginning of road accident claims, how they are funded and the pitfalls to be aware of, particularly regarding insurance companies.  However, similar issues could apply to any type of accident compensation claim.

For many commercial entities involved in the personal injury claims business, an accident is purely a commodity to be bought and sold.  Despite the apparent lack of openness, almost all insurance companies will trade a claim for cash, potentially exploiting the injured party rather than protecting their interests.  Many insurers may soon be launching advertising campaigns to persuade the public to deal with them direct, but concealing their real motivation.

Like all injury compensation claims, a road accident claim can only be pursued by solicitors.  Adverts from claims companies on TV, on the Internet and in newspapers might suggest they will handle each case personally, but this is incorrect.  They actually sell the claim to solicitors on their appointed panel, often for a price of between £600 and £800.  The chosen solicitor will usually handle the matter on the basis that the injured person pays no legal costs, but some claims companies either charge a set amount or take a slice of the compensation once the case is successful, and which can amount to a substantial figure.  Before responding to this type of advertising, why not do some research and find a firm of specialist claims solicitors with a proven track record, and deal with them direct.

Published in Truckstop News December 2009.

In this month’s issue Steven Hinchliffe of the specialist Personal Injury Compensation firm Hinchliffes Solicitors will consider more “READERS’ SUCCESSFUL ACCIDENT CLAIMS”.

Continuing his review of successfully completed accident injury claims, Steven Hinchliffe looks at more situations experienced by readers of Truckstop News that resulted in an award of personal injury compensation.

All of the accident victims mentioned are actual clients of my firm, Hinchliffes Solicitors.  They have kindly given their permission for the disclosure of their details, and in particular of their real life experiences of incidents resulting in personal injury claims, and the steps taken to make a successful accident compensation claim.  All of these clients contacted my firm after seeing our details in Truckstop News - and readers may recognise some of the names referred to.

In this article I highlight 2 very different types of accident that resulted in significant injuries and as with the other articles in this series the common trend remains the effect on each individual’s life.  However, in both cases there were modest claims for financial losses and the sums recovered for the physical injuries formed the bulk of the accident compensation.  Although using the process of law to make personal injury claims as a means of redress cannot truly compensate for the trauma and inconvenience suffered, it can assist in requiring the guilty party to provide medical treatment and rehabilitation, in addition to financial relief by way of awards of compensation.  As previously indicated, the basic aim of an accident claim is to try and return the injured party to the position that he or she would otherwise have been in had the accident not happened.