Archive for the 'Industrial disease' Category

On 9 July the Government published its consultation paper with a view to responding to the controversial decision made by the House of Lords on 17 October 2007 that workers who had pleural plaques should not be compensated for this by their employers.

Pleural plaques are small localised areas of fibrosis that are found within tissues in the lungs and which are caused by exposure to asbestos.  Prior to this landmark decision injury compensation was recoverable for this condition.

The consultation paper will consider issues of law and the medical evidence upon which the House of Lords relied in making their decision.  Action to promote a greater understanding of the condition is also suggested, in addition to increased support once a diagnosis is made to ease concerns, particularly regarding the recognised asbestos related illnesses asbestosis and mesothelioma.

The Ministry of Justice has announced that a consultation on the Law Lords’ pleural plaques ruling begins this month and is expected to reach a decision in time for the Queen’s speech in November.

The consultation will consider options including restoring the right to injury compensation for pleural plaques which was removed by a decision of the House of Lords in 2007.

Pleural plaques rarely cause physical symptoms but they are a sign of asbestos damage and are associated with an increased risk of developing fatal conditions like mesothelioma.  Simply having knowledge of the condition often causes sufferers to become anxious or even clinically depressed.

Published in Truckstop News - June 2008.

In this month’s issue Steven Hinchliffe of the specialist Personal Injury firm Hinchliffes Solicitors examines instances of “WORK RELATED ILLNESSES AND DISEASES”.

It is quite common for workers to develop an illness or disease after coming into contact with harmful substances in their workplace.  If this situation arises, the employer who exposed the worker to such substances may have to pay compensation.

Where a worker’s job might bring them into contact with dangerous substances, their employer should investigate the possibility of replacing the substances with something less harmful.  However, if it is decided that contact with the substances is unavoidable, the employer should provide appropriate protective clothing and equipment, to minimise the risks.

After contracting an allergy to latex while at work, a trainee nurse was threatened with disciplinary action for using latex free gloves.  However, she subsequently made a successful claim for personal injury compensation and is to receive a payment for this work related medical condition.

The nurse, who worked at the Scarborough General Hospital, developed the latex allergy from routinely wearing gloves as part of her job.  Latex free gloves were not made available to her and the only type of gloves available to the staff on the wards was latex based.

She was told that if she was found using latex free gloves without prior permission from the Occupational Health department and her ward sister, this would be a punishable offence and she could face disciplinary action.

A woman who was exposed to asbestos when she worked in a factory as a teenager has been awarded substantial compensation when she made a personal injury claim.

It was not until 2006 that the woman (now aged 65) was diagnosed with mesothelioma, which disease is caused by exposure to asbestos dust.  Tragically, once a diagnosis is made sufferers of this condition often have only a few months to live.

The exposure to asbestos happened while she was working as a clerk for a clothing company.  Asbestos was used in the factory in steam pipes, and also in protective pads that were used to press the garments.  She was only 16 years old at the time and remembers that asbestos would fall from the ceiling, which she then had to sweep up.  As a result she was covered with asbestos dust and this penetrated to her lungs, causing the fatal disease.

A British Lung Foundation study has found that trades people and factory workers could be inadvertently putting themselves at risk of asbestos related conditions.

The study spoke to 399 trades people (such as builders, plumbers, carpenters, electricians and gas fitters) of varying ages. Less than a third of them were aware that asbestos exposure can cause cancer, and a similar number thought that most asbestos has been removed from UK buildings. In addition 74% of those surveyed had not been trained to deal with asbestos.

Dame Helena Shovelton, Chief Executive of the British Lung Foundation said:
“It is a great worry that those most at risk know so little about it.”
“We want mesothelioma to become a disease of the past, but until people become asbestosis aware and protect themselves against asbestos that goal can’t be reached.”

A January 2008 High Court ruling has removed hopes of securing personal injury compensation for dozens of miners suffering with Vibration White Finger. The case was brought collectively because many former miners had their injury compensation claims rejected by the Government appointed claims handlers under the British Coal VWF Claims Handling Arrangement (CHA). The CHA was set up to pay accident compensation to miners exposed to vibrating tools and machinery while working at coal pits.